COLLECTION NAME:
The AMICA Library
mediaCollectionId
AMICO~1~1
The AMICA Library
Collection
true
AMICA ID:
CMA_.1986.70
amicoid
CMA_.1986.70
AMICA ID
false
AMICA Library Year:
1998
aly
1998
AMICA Library Year
false
Object Type:
Decorative Arts and Utilitarian Objects
oty
Decorative Arts and Utilitarian Objects
Object Type
false
Creator Nationality:
Asian; Indian Sub-Continent; Indian
crc
Asian; Indian Sub-Continent; Indian
Creator Nationality
false
Creator Dates/Places:
India
cdt
India
Creator Dates/Places
false
Creator Name-CRT:
India, Kashmir, 8th Century
crt
India, Kashmir, 8th Century
Creator Name-CRT
false
Title:
Fasting Buddha
otn
Fasting Buddha
Title
false
Title Type:
Primary
ott
Primary
Title Type
false
View:
Full View
rid
Full View
View
false
Creation Date:
8th Century
oct
8th Century
Creation Date
false
Creation Start Date:
700
ocs
700
Creation Start Date
false
Creation End Date:
799
oce
799
Creation End Date
false
Materials and Techniques:
ivory
omd
ivory
Materials and Techniques
false
Classification Term:
Ivory
clt
Ivory
Classification Term
false
Classification Term:
Ivory
clt
Ivory
Classification Term
false
Creation Place:
Kashmir
ocp
Kashmir
Creation Place
false
Dimensions:
Overall: 12.4cm x 9.5cm
met
Overall: 12.4cm x 9.5cm
Dimensions
false
AMICA Contributor:
The Cleveland Museum of Art
oon
The Cleveland Museum of Art
AMICA Contributor
false
Owner Location:
Cleveland, Ohio, USA
oop
Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Owner Location
false
ID Number:
1986.70
ooa
1986.70
ID Number
false
Credit Line:
Leonard C. Hanna, Jr. Fund
ooc
Leonard C. Hanna, Jr. Fund
Credit Line
false
Rights:
orl
<a href="http://www.clemusart.com/museum/disclaim2.html"target="_new">http://www.clemusart.com/museum/disclaim2.html</a>
Rights
false
Context:
After the Begram ivories, the second largest group of ancient ivories from the Indian world that survives is from Kashmir. Unlike the Begram ivories, which were secular, Kashmir ivories are exclusively Buddhist and most were produced in ateliers active in the eighth century. As suggested by a couple of surviving examples (one in the British Museum and another in private collection in India), they were conceived as small portable altars. A larger central plaque, such as the one seen here, was set in a painted wooden architectural shrine and flanked by two smaller ivory figures of attendants. Although only two complete shrines are known today, several ivory plaques and attendant figures still survive. The ivory here (one of two owned by the museum) is unusual in terms of its iconography since it shows Buddha as a fasting ascetic. This iconography, while popular in Gandharan art, was not commonly found outside this school. Buddha sits within the trefoil-arched cave in the dhyanasana position, with his hands folded in his lap in the meditation gesture. His emaciated body with the conventional but effective skeletal-vein structure, sunken stomach, and haggard face are the most successful means used by the artist to portray the haunting image of an ascetic who overcomes the limitations imposed on him by his human form in order to attain higher spiritual values. In accordance with the rules of continuous narration, the master is shown three times (two figures of Buddha flank the central image). On the left, heis in his emaciated form with his head resting on his right hand supported by his left raised knee, as if exhausted. The female figure immediately below him seems to offer him a rice-filled bowl (like those used by Buddhist monks to beg for food). It maywell represent Sujata, who provided Buddha's first meal at the conclusion of his austerities. Here, however, he seems oblivious to her offer. On the right, he is seated in the "European pose" (pralambapadasana) with his legs extending down from the throne,supported by the lotus. Once again well nourished, he is attired in monastic garb, indicating that he has achieved enlightenment. He now holds his begging bowl in the palm of his left hand, while his right, partially broken, is raised to his open mouthinthe gesture of eating. Next to him is another female, probably again Sujata. The three Buddhas sit on a cushioned rocky podium. The rock formations among the figures that hover above the central images suggest a cave setting. Also present are celestial attendants on the top, the usual heads of ascetics (siddhas) framing the arch, and many yaksha and dwarf-like figures, probably representing the temptation of Buddha by the evil forces of Mara. Although partially damaged in the center, the scene below looks like an ordinary genre scene with multiple figures involved in a lively discussion. Because cows are present and some figures seem to be churning butter (ghi), the scene could depict the household of Sujata's father (who was a cowherd), where the story ofBuddha's enlightenment is discussed in vivid terms. It may, however, simply depict villagers and their flock paying homage to Buddha. The panel is a superb example of refined workmanship, more intricate and delicate than most. This ivory employs a richajour‚ (pierced) technique where the perforated areas create a lace-like effect. The plaque curves slightly, following the tusk's natural contour. No traces of paint remain, which may indicate that the piece was cleaned at one point. The ivory has a richbrown patination. S.C.
cxd
After the Begram ivories, the second largest group of ancient ivories from the Indian world that survives is from Kashmir. Unlike the Begram ivories, which were secular, Kashmir ivories are exclusively Buddhist and most were produced in ateliers active in the eighth century. As suggested by a couple of surviving examples (one in the British Museum and another in private collection in India), they were conceived as small portable altars. A larger central plaque, such as the one seen here, was set in a painted wooden architectural shrine and flanked by two smaller ivory figures of attendants. Although only two complete shrines are known today, several ivory plaques and attendant figures still survive. The ivory here (one of two owned by the museum) is unusual in terms of its iconography since it shows Buddha as a fasting ascetic. This iconography, while popular in Gandharan art, was not commonly found outside this school. Buddha sits within the trefoil-arched cave in the dhyanasana position, with his hands folded in his lap in the meditation gesture. His emaciated body with the conventional but effective skeletal-vein structure, sunken stomach, and haggard face are the most successful means used by the artist to portray the haunting image of an ascetic who overcomes the limitations imposed on him by his human form in order to attain higher spiritual values. In accordance with the rules of continuous narration, the master is shown three times (two figures of Buddha flank the central image). On the left, heis in his emaciated form with his head resting on his right hand supported by his left raised knee, as if exhausted. The female figure immediately below him seems to offer him a rice-filled bowl (like those used by Buddhist monks to beg for food). It maywell represent Sujata, who provided Buddha's first meal at the conclusion of his austerities. Here, however, he seems oblivious to her offer. On the right, he is seated in the "European pose" (pralambapadasana) with his legs extending down from the throne,supported by the lotus. Once again well nourished, he is attired in monastic garb, indicating that he has achieved enlightenment. He now holds his begging bowl in the palm of his left hand, while his right, partially broken, is raised to his open mouthinthe gesture of eating. Next to him is another female, probably again Sujata. The three Buddhas sit on a cushioned rocky podium. The rock formations among the figures that hover above the central images suggest a cave setting. Also present are celestial attendants on the top, the usual heads of ascetics (siddhas) framing the arch, and many yaksha and dwarf-like figures, probably representing the temptation of Buddha by the evil forces of Mara. Although partially damaged in the center, the scene below looks like an ordinary genre scene with multiple figures involved in a lively discussion. Because cows are present and some figures seem to be churning butter (ghi), the scene could depict the household of Sujata's father (who was a cowherd), where the story ofBuddha's enlightenment is discussed in vivid terms. It may, however, simply depict villagers and their flock paying homage to Buddha. The panel is a superb example of refined workmanship, more intricate and delicate than most. This ivory employs a richajour‚ (pierced) technique where the perforated areas create a lace-like effect. The plaque curves slightly, following the tusk's natural contour. No traces of paint remain, which may indicate that the piece was cleaned at one point. The ivory has a richbrown patination. S.C.
Context
false
Related Image Identifier Link:
CMA_.1986.70.tif
ril
CMA_.1986.70.tif
Related Image Identifier Link
false